Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to yet another busy year for the Engineering Design Graphics Division!Over the past years, the leadership of the division has worked together to provide quality experiences for both new and old (in years of service only) members.This coming year will be no exception with many opportunities to be active within our profession.Our first Mid-Year Meeting of 2012 will start the New Year off in Galveston, Texas, and in June we will have our annual ASEE conference in San Antonio.Two international events related to our field that will take place in 2012 includes the International Society for Geometry & Graphics conference in Montreal, Canada in August and our division's Mid-Year Conference to be held in Limerick, Ireland in November 2012, our first overseas adventure.These different meetings allow professionals in engineering design graphics to come together, make new friends, develop professionally, and share research from the field as we strive to constantly improve ourselves, the students we serve, and our profession of engineering design graphics.Please take time to come and participate in as many of these different venues as you can because it's the information presented in settings like these that help formulate the content we see in our Engineering Design Graphics Journal and other journals related to our field as well as indicate directions our profession is taking both nationally and internationally.Please help "set the stage" for the future of our field and division.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it