Bibliographic record
Abstract
Welcome to yet another busy year for the Engineering Design Graphics Division!Over the past years, the leadership of the division has worked together to provide quality experiences for both new and old (in years of service only) members.This coming year will be no exception with many opportunities to be active within our profession.Our first Mid-Year Meeting of 2012 will start the New Year off in Galveston, Texas, and in June we will have our annual ASEE conference in San Antonio.Two international events related to our field that will take place in 2012 includes the International Society for Geometry & Graphics conference in Montreal, Canada in August and our division's Mid-Year Conference to be held in Limerick, Ireland in November 2012, our first overseas adventure.These different meetings allow professionals in engineering design graphics to come together, make new friends, develop professionally, and share research from the field as we strive to constantly improve ourselves, the students we serve, and our profession of engineering design graphics.Please take time to come and participate in as many of these different venues as you can because it's the information presented in settings like these that help formulate the content we see in our Engineering Design Graphics Journal and other journals related to our field as well as indicate directions our profession is taking both nationally and internationally.Please help "set the stage" for the future of our field and division.On a personal note, I would like to thank Tim Sexton for his leadership this past year as Chair as well as all members of the executive board for the great work accomplished under Tim's leadership.We have joining our executive board the Vice Chair elect Nancy Study, who has already started her position working on scholarship recipients for our January Mid-Year meeting in Texas.Also, Nicholas Bertozzi was re-elected as Director of Communications, we thank Nick for the wonderful job he has done for the division.In closing, I would like make two charges to the members.First, plan to share your work through our refereed journal so that we can improve our profession with new knowledge and understandings.Second, please promote our division and help us grow in membership this coming year.Reach out to other colleagues here in the United States and other countries in engineering, technology, design, and education and personally invite each to become active members of our Engineering Design Graphics Division.Professionally yours in service,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.910 | 0.855 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".