MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411168106 · doi:10.18260/edgj.v77i3.386

Full Issue

2019· article· en· W4411168106 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering design graphics journal · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEarthquake and Disaster Impact Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaIrish Research Council
KeywordsComputer scienceMathematics educationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the most valuable benefits of participating in EDGD is the opportunity to attend its conferences.Of all the professional conferences I attend, whether research or education related, my favorite by far is the EDGD Midyear Conference.At the Midyear, I truly feel that I am among friends and family.It is a collection of educators with common goals and interests, but the differences in their means and approaches are what make discussions exciting.The Midyear Conference is small enough to afford a personal touch, and the expenses are always kept to a reasonable level.If you haven't been to an EDGD conference lately, I fully encourage you to do so.While much can be learned from reading papers and watching webinars or video presentations, there is really no substitute for face-to-face discussion.Conferences are the places to make friends as well as professional contacts.They are places to discover new ideas, technologies, and different approaches to common problems.They are places to bounce your own ideas off others who can offer qualified opinions and advice.These types of interaction are best done at a personal level: over a meal, in the hallway, or on a tour.Remember that you can attend a conference even if you are not presenting a paper.I've done this more often than not, and I've always come away refreshed, inspired, and full of new ideas.The recent 68 th EDGD Midyear Conference, held on 20-22 October 2014 at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Worchester MA, carried on the tradition of EDGD conferences that are well-organized, informative, and just plain fun.I wish to congratulate the organizers for a job well-done, especially Site Chair Holly Ault, and Program Chairs Nick Bertozzi and Kathryn Holliday-Darr.The 68 th Midyear boasted sixty participants from twenty different universities and five industrial partners (Autodesk, Parts Solutions, PTC, Schroff Development Corporation, and Solidworks).Seventeen technical papers were presented and four professional workshops were conducted.The event highlight was a most memorable dinner among the exhibits at the Worcester Art Museum.At the Midyear Conference, Lulu Sun and Heidi M. Steinhauer, won the Media Showcase Award for their presentation of, "Using Multimedia Online Learning Tools to Supplement the Classroom Instruction."The Oppenheimer Award was won by Thomas Delahunty, Niall Seery, and Raymond Lynch for their presentation of, "Conceptualization in Visuospatial Reasoning Tasks: A Research Direction."In addition the Lulu Sun and Christopher Grant were selected as winners

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it