Notice bibliographique
Résumé
One of the most valuable benefits of participating in EDGD is the opportunity to attend its conferences.Of all the professional conferences I attend, whether research or education related, my favorite by far is the EDGD Midyear Conference.At the Midyear, I truly feel that I am among friends and family.It is a collection of educators with common goals and interests, but the differences in their means and approaches are what make discussions exciting.The Midyear Conference is small enough to afford a personal touch, and the expenses are always kept to a reasonable level.If you haven't been to an EDGD conference lately, I fully encourage you to do so.While much can be learned from reading papers and watching webinars or video presentations, there is really no substitute for face-to-face discussion.Conferences are the places to make friends as well as professional contacts.They are places to discover new ideas, technologies, and different approaches to common problems.They are places to bounce your own ideas off others who can offer qualified opinions and advice.These types of interaction are best done at a personal level: over a meal, in the hallway, or on a tour.Remember that you can attend a conference even if you are not presenting a paper.I've done this more often than not, and I've always come away refreshed, inspired, and full of new ideas.The recent 68 th EDGD Midyear Conference, held on 20-22 October 2014 at Worcester Polytechnic Institute in Worchester MA, carried on the tradition of EDGD conferences that are well-organized, informative, and just plain fun.I wish to congratulate the organizers for a job well-done, especially Site Chair Holly Ault, and Program Chairs Nick Bertozzi and Kathryn Holliday-Darr.The 68 th Midyear boasted sixty participants from twenty different universities and five industrial partners (Autodesk, Parts Solutions, PTC, Schroff Development Corporation, and Solidworks).Seventeen technical papers were presented and four professional workshops were conducted.The event highlight was a most memorable dinner among the exhibits at the Worcester Art Museum.At the Midyear Conference, Lulu Sun and Heidi M. Steinhauer, won the Media Showcase Award for their presentation of, "Using Multimedia Online Learning Tools to Supplement the Classroom Instruction."The Oppenheimer Award was won by Thomas Delahunty, Niall Seery, and Raymond Lynch for their presentation of, "Conceptualization in Visuospatial Reasoning Tasks: A Research Direction."In addition the Lulu Sun and Christopher Grant were selected as winners of the 2013 Chair's Award for their paper, "Inquiry-Guided Learning (IGL) in Graphical Communications Course."These papers are fine examples of the expanding scope of the Division, encompassing topics such as visual and learning science, as well as traditional
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,883 | 0,812 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».