Event-Triggered Fault-Tolerant Consensus Control of Multiagent Systems With Hybrid Attacks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, the fault-tolerant consensus control (FTCC) challenge is investigated for nonlinear multiagent systems (MASs) in the simultaneous occurrence of abrupt and incipient actuator/sensor faults in the physical level and hybrid Deception/Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks in the cyber level. For security enhancement and/or safety maintenance purposes, an unknown state and fault decoupling-based augmented estimator is first devised, and a distributed event-triggered FTCC protocol is then developed to achieve strength against hostile attacks and faults, respectively, with the incorporation of augmented state estimation, neighboring sensor fault estimation, and latest successfully triggered output interaction. By constructing dual indicators along with average dwelling time and attack frequency technique, criteria of exponential mean-square consensus of the nonlinear MASs subject to hybrid attacks are obtained. In the end, simulation is outlined to illustrate the efficacy and improvements of the developed event-triggered FTCC methodology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".