MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411171951 · doi:10.1109/tccn.2025.3578509

Energy-Efficient Resource Allocation for FeMBB and eURLLC Coexistence in RSMA-Based Wireless Networks

2025· article· en· W4411171951 on OpenAlexaff
Shiva Kazemi Taskou, Mehdi Rasti, Ekram Hossain

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceResource allocationWirelessComputer networkResource management (computing)Wireless networkEnergy (signal processing)Distributed computingTelecommunicationsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Emerging 5G-Advanced and 6G wireless networks are anticipated to support a wide array of services, including further enhanced mobile broadband (FeMBB) and extreme ultra-reliable low-latency communications (eURLLC), to meet diverse communication needs. The radio access network (RAN) slicing is a pivotal technology for enabling the delivery of these services on shared infrastructure, playing a particularly important role in 6G, where FeMBB and eURLLC services have different blocklengths. To meet varying quality of service (QoS) demands in next-generation networks, innovative multiple access techniques are required to improve interference management and optimize spectrum efficiency. Rate-splitting multiple access (RSMA) is an effective approach for achieving these objectives. This paper investigates the problem of Energy-efficient joint Resource block (RB) allocation and Power control (ERP) for the coexistence of FeMBB and eURLLC services in RSMA-based green communication networks. In this ERP problem, each FeMBB user is guaranteed a minimum data rate, while each eURLLC user must satisfy latency and reliability constraints. To address the ERP problem, we introduce a sub-optimal algorithm (SO-ERP) based on convex optimization. However, the SO-ERP algorithm has high computational complexity and requires approximations to convexify the original ERP problem, potentially moving the solution away from the optimum. To overcome these limitations, we propose a hybrid deep reinforcement learning (HDRL-ERP) algorithm that employs a dueling double deep Q-network for RB allocation and a deep deterministic policy gradient for power control. Simulation results are presented to illustrate the performance of SO-ERP and HDRL-ERP algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and NetworkingSame topicAdvanced Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207