MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gate Leakage Current Integration-Based Dielectric Breakdown Monitor in a 12nm FinFET Process

2025· article· en· W4411173527 on OpenAlexafffund
Mateo Rendón, Ian E. J. Hill, A. Ivanov

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSemiconductor materials and devices
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMaterials scienceLeakage (economics)DielectricOptoelectronicsProcess (computing)Electronic engineeringElectrical engineeringEngineering physicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Time-dependent dielectric breakdown (TDDB) is a critical contributor to wear-out failures in semiconductors, aggravated by scaling of thin-oxide fabrication processes. Stress-induced leakage current (SILC) that increases with wear-out in these thin-oxide transistors correlates to TDDB hard failure risk, however existing in-field monitoring solutions struggle to characterize picoamp currents and maintain effective bias during measurements. We present a sensor for in-field predictive TDDB failure risk assessment of gate dielectrics based on SILC characterization via a current integration measurement scheme. The sensor enables constant voltage bias and current amplification during measurement within a simple 5-transistor topology. Our design is fabricated in a 12nm FinFET process and subjected to accelerated aging stress using an in-house test platform to verify the design, with eight sensor variants showing good correlation with simulation results. Observed SILC degradation and soft breakdown events allow for detailed analysis and comparison of transistor wear-out across gate oxide stack-ups, enabling future semiconductor in-field failure risk management strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSemiconductor materials and devicesFrench-language works237,207