MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4411179312 · doi:10.1103/physrevd.111.123513

Measurements of the temperature and <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"> <mml:mi>E</mml:mi> </mml:math> -mode polarization of the cosmic microwave background from the full 500-square-degree SPTpol dataset

2025· article· en· W4411179312 on OpenAlexaff
T.-L. Chou, P. A. R. Ade, A. J. Anderson, Jason E. Austermann, L. Balkenhol, James A. Beall, A. N. Bender, B. A. Benson, F. Bianchini, L. E. Bleem, J. E. Carlstrom, C. L. Chang, P. Chaubal, H. C. Chiang, R. Citron, C. Corbett Moran, T. M. Crawford, A. T. Crites, T. de Haan, M. A. Dobbs, D. Dutcher, W. Everett, J. Gallicchio, E. M. George, N. Gupta, N. W. Halverson, G. P. Holder, W. L. Holzapfel, J. D. Hrubes, N. Huang, Johannes Hubmayr, K. D. Irwin, L. Knox, A. T. Lee, D. Li, A. E. Lowitz, J. J. McMahon, J. Montgomery, Tyler Natoli, J. P. Nibarger, G. I. Noble, V. Novosad, Y. Omori, S. Padin, S. Patil, C. Pryke, Wei Quan, C. L. Reichardt, J. E. Ruhl, B. R. Saliwanchik, K. K. Schaffer, C. Sievers, G. Smecher, A. A. Stark, C. Tucker, Todd Veach, J. D. Vieira, G. Wang, N. Whitehorn, W. L. K. Wu, V. Yefremenko, J. A. Zebrowski

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsThree-Speed Logic (Canada)Canadian Institute for Theoretical AstrophysicsUniversity of TorontoCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchMcGill University
FundersAustralian Research CouncilU.S. Department of EnergyHigh Energy PhysicsUniversity of ChicagoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCosmic microwave backgroundPhysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Mode (computer interface)MicrowaveComputer scienceOpticsQuantum mechanicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors build upon, and extend, previous work to now use the Full 500-square-degree South Pole Telescope Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) polarization dataset. They confirm previous \ensuremath{\Lambda}CDM-consistent results and obtain the most sensitive measurements of the lensed-CMB damping tail to date.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.023

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. D/Physical review. D.→Same topicCosmology and Gravitation Theories→French-language works237,207→