Derecho de libre determinación y derecho a decidir Nueva soberanía y Derechos Humanos en el siglo XXI
Bibliographic record
Abstract
El denominado «derecho a decidir» en su acepción política más reciente viene capitalizando en los últimos tiempos buena parte del debate político internacional e interno en naciones diversas como Catalunya, Euskal Herria, Escocia, Québec o Flandes, entre otros lugares significativos. La lógica política y democrática de dicha reclamación de libertades políticas es evidente para muchas naciones sin Estado, de manera que la socialización política del concepto es, desde mi punto de vista, un hecho positivo que acerca a la sociedad un debate complejo tanto en el plano del Derecho Internacional como en el interno. El objeto del presente estudio es el análisis e interpretación contemporánea de la institución jurídica de Derecho Internacional que da cobertura y efectividad jurídica previa al denominado, recientemente y en términos políticos, «derecho a decidir».
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".