The Impact of Self-Sufficiency in Basic Raw Materials of Metallurgical Companies on Required Return and Capitalization: The Case of Russia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article considers the impact of self-sufficiency in basic raw materials on the level of systematic risk, required return and capitalization on the example of Russian ferrous metallurgy companies. The methods applied include classical approaches to determining beta coefficient, required return and capitalization, as well as correlation–regression analysis performed in the Python programming language (version 3.0, libraries: Numpy, Pandas, Matplotlib, Datetime, Statistics, Scipy, Bambi). The study revealed an inverse relationship between the self-sufficiency of ferrous metallurgy companies in iron ore and coking coal and their systematic risk. That was confirmed by the developed regression model. The presence of this dependence directly indicates the need to consider self-sufficiency when assessing a company’s required return and capitalization. The acquisition of the Tikhov coal mine by PJSC Magnitogorsk Iron and Steel Works (MMK) led to an increase in capitalization not only due to additional profit from the new asset, but also due to a decrease in the required return caused by the growth of the company’s self-sufficiency in coking coal. The proposed approach contributes to a more accurate assessment of the company’s capitalization and creates additional incentives for vertical integration transactions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it