MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411183891 · doi:10.1080/03610918.2025.2515193

A simple and efficient eM-algorithm for one-shot device data analysis

2025· article· en· W4411183891 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaojun Zhu, Yanmin Li, N. Balakrishnan

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersHumanities and Social Science Fund of Ministry of Education of ChinaXi’an Jiaotong-Liverpool University
KeywordsSimple (philosophy)AlgorithmShot (pellet)Computer scienceSingle shotOne shotSIMPLE algorithmPhysicsMaterials scienceOpticsEngineeringComputational physicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we propose a simple and efficient EM-algorithm for estimating the model parameters based on one-shot device data. Traditionally, in the classical Expectation Maximization algorithm (EM-algorithm), unobserved failure times are regarded as the missing information and then imputed. In contrast, we consider here the counts of failures occurring between two successive inspection times to be missing. We provide detailed procedures, assuming that the lifetimes of one-shot devices follow the exponential and Weibull distributions, respectively. A Monte Carlo simulation study reveals that this simple approach markedly increases the convergence speed, a perennial challenge when using the EM-algorithm. The new method consistently finds the maximum likelihood estimates, unlike the traditional method which fails sometimes because some expectations do not exist based on the parameter estimates obtained from the previous M-step. Finally, an example is provided for illustrative purpose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.266
GPT teacher head0.469
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunications in Statistics - Simulation and ComputationSame topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207