MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411185043 · doi:10.1063/5.0270910

13-moment-equations from nonequilibrium thermodynamics and kinetic theory: Comparison for non-linear one-dimensional flows

2025· article· en· W4411185043 on OpenAlexafffund
L. E. Bell, Henning Struchtrup

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsExtended irreversible thermodynamicsThermodynamicsMoment (physics)Kinetic theoryKinetic energyStatistical physicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The GENERIC-13 moment equations (general equation for the non-equilibrium reversible-irreversible coupling) [Struchtrup & Öttinger, Phys. Fluids 34, 017105 (2022)] were developed to have complete thermodynamic structure, in contrast to Grad's 13-moment equations which are not accompanied by a suitable formulation of the second law of thermodynamics and loose hyperbolicity for larger deviations from equilibrium. With GENERIC-13 constructed to agree with Grad-13 to second order in the Knudsen number, both sets are considered and compared for hyperbolicity and plane heat transfer, and Couette and Poiseuille flows. It is shown that the GENERIC-13 equations are unconditionally hyperbolic. Jump and slip boundary conditions for GENERIC-13 are developed from the second law with coefficients adapted from kinetic theory. Additional asymptotically vanishing boundary conditions are constructed such that solutions of the GENERIC-13 equations reduce to those of Grad-13 to second and of Navier–Stokes–Fourier equations to first order in the Knudsen number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.824

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207