MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411185043 · doi:10.1063/5.0270910

13-moment-equations from nonequilibrium thermodynamics and kinetic theory: Comparison for non-linear one-dimensional flows

2025· article· en· W4411185043 on OpenAlexafffund
L. E. Bell, Henning Struchtrup

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPhysicsNon-equilibrium thermodynamicsExtended irreversible thermodynamicsThermodynamicsMoment (physics)Kinetic theoryKinetic energyStatistical physicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The GENERIC-13 moment equations (general equation for the non-equilibrium reversible-irreversible coupling) [Struchtrup & Öttinger, Phys. Fluids 34, 017105 (2022)] were developed to have complete thermodynamic structure, in contrast to Grad's 13-moment equations which are not accompanied by a suitable formulation of the second law of thermodynamics and loose hyperbolicity for larger deviations from equilibrium. With GENERIC-13 constructed to agree with Grad-13 to second order in the Knudsen number, both sets are considered and compared for hyperbolicity and plane heat transfer, and Couette and Poiseuille flows. It is shown that the GENERIC-13 equations are unconditionally hyperbolic. Jump and slip boundary conditions for GENERIC-13 are developed from the second law with coefficients adapted from kinetic theory. Additional asymptotically vanishing boundary conditions are constructed such that solutions of the GENERIC-13 equations reduce to those of Grad-13 to second and of Navier–Stokes–Fourier equations to first order in the Knudsen number.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207