MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411185283 · doi:10.1108/apjml-01-2025-0025

Virtual influencers in marketing: addressing authenticity challenges through anthropomorphism

2025· article· en· W4411185283 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAsia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAI in Service Interactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanWilfrid Laurier UniversityCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInfluencer marketingAdvertisingBusinessMarketingMarketing managementRelationship marketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Virtual influencers are emerging as prominent digital brand endorsers on social media; however, their perceived authenticity remains a critical challenge to their marketing effectiveness. This research addresses this gap and investigates how the anthropomorphism of virtual influencers – in appearance and behavior – differentially affects perceived authenticity through the mechanism of social presence, ultimately shaping audiences’ purchase intentions. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from social presence theory and anthropomorphism literature, we developed a theoretical framework to examine how two dimensions of anthropomorphism – appearance and behavior – translate into perceived authenticity through social presence. Additionally, we explore how these relationships vary across virtual influencer types, such as human-like and animal-like personas. An online survey was conducted via Credamo. A dataset of responses from 415 followers of virtual influencers was analyzed using SmartPLS 4.0. Findings The empirical findings reveal that both anthropomorphic appearance and behavior positively impact perceived authenticity via social presence, driving purchase intentions. Notably, anthropomorphic behavior plays a more significant role than appearance, influencing perceived authenticity both directly and indirectly via social presence. In contrast, anthropomorphic appearance affects perceived authenticity only indirectly, with a weaker effect than anthropomorphic behavior. Additionally, the strengths of these relationships vary across influencer types, such as human-like and animal-like virtual influencers. Originality/value This research pioneers scholarly efforts to address the authenticity challenges associated with virtual influencers, emphasizing that the authenticity gap is not a fixed limitation but a dynamic issue that can be addressed through deliberate design and operational strategies for virtual influencers. It advances virtual influencer research by investigating two key dimensions of anthropomorphism – appearance and behavior – and elucidating the relationship between anthropomorphism and authenticity through the lens of social presence. It uncovers variations in the effects of anthropomorphism across different types of virtual influencers, offering a sound framework to understand the dynamic interactions among factors studied.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it