Engineering Lipid–Polymer Nanoparticles for siRNA Delivery to Cancer Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful tool that can target many proteins without the expensive and time-consuming drug development studies. However, due to the challenges in delivering RNA molecules, the potential impact of RNAi approaches is yet to be fully realized in clinical settings. Lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) have been the most successful delivery system for nucleic acids, but targeted delivery to a solid tumor still eludes the developed LNPs. We hypothesized that specially designed low-molecular-weight PEIs can partially or completely replace the ionizable lipids for more accommodating vehicles due to the structural flexibility offered by polymers, which could lead to safer and more efficient nucleic acid delivery. Methods: To achieve this, we first optimized the LNP formulations as a point of reference for three outcomes: cellular uptake, cytotoxicity, and silencing efficiency. Using a response surface methodology (Design Expert), we optimized siRNA delivery by varying mole fractions of lipid components. Leveraging the optimal LNP formulation, we integrated specifically designed cationic polymers as partial or complete replacements for the ionizable lipid. This methodological approach, incorporating optimal combined designs and response surface methodologies, refined the LPNPs to an optimal efficiency. Results: Our data revealed that DOPE and Dlin-MC3-DMA contributed to higher efficiency in selected breast cancer cells over DSPC and ALC-0315 as neutral and ionizable lipids, respectively, based on the software analysis and direct comparative experiments. Incorporation of selected polymers enhanced the cellular internalization significantly, which in some formulations resulted in higher efficiency. Conclusions: These findings offer a framework for the rational design of LPNPs, that could enhance the passive targeting and silencing efficiency in cancer treatment and broader applications for RNAi-based strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".