Clinical efficacy of fire-needle warming therapy in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis of cold-dampness type and its effect on serum IL-1β and MMP-3
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore the clinical efficacy of fire-needle warming therapy in managing knee osteoarthritis attributed to cold-dampness patterns. Specifically, it evaluates the therapy's influence on interleukin-1β (IL-1β) serum concentrations and matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 80 patients treated for knee osteoarthritis from September 2023 to February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: 40 received electroacupuncture, and 40 received fire acupuncture combined with warming techniques. The primary outcome measures included treatment efficacy, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, compare the changes in IL-1β and MMP-3 levels in serum and synovial fluid between two groups, and compare the total knee joint X-ray scores between the two groups: pain levels and knee joint function. Adverse reactions were also recorded. RESULTS: The fire acupuncture group had a significantly higher treatment efficacy rate (92.5%) compared to the electroacupuncture group (75%, P < 0.05). Both groups showed significant reductions in WOMAC scores post-treatment, with a greater reduction in the fire acupuncture group (P < 0.05). Serum levels of IL-1β and MMP-3 decreased significantly in both groups, with a more pronounced decrease in the fire acupuncture group (P < 0.05). After 4 weeks of intervention and 8 weeks of follow-up, the levels of IL-1β and MMP-3 in the synovial fluid of the fire needle group and the electroacupuncture group were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), and the fire needle group was significantly lower than the electroacupuncture group (P < 0.05). Pain and knee function scores improved significantly in both groups, with the fire acupuncture group showing greater improvements (P < 0.05). After 4 weeks of intervention and 8 weeks of follow-up, the total joint X-ray scores of the fire needle group and the electroacupuncture group were significantly reduced (P < 0.05), and the fire needle group was significantly lower than the electroacupuncture group (P < 0.05). The adverse reaction rate was lower in the fire acupuncture group (5%) compared to the electroacupuncture group (20%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Fire-needle warming therapy demonstrates significant clinical efficacy in treating knee osteoarthritis of the cold-dampness type. It effectively reduces inflammation and pain and improves knee function, suggesting its potential for broader clinical application. Further research is recommended to confirm these findings. Key Points • Fire needle acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: Fire needle acupuncture is highly effective in treating cold-dampness arthralgia-type knee osteoarthritis by promoting blood circulation, enhancing metabolism, and reducing inflammation. • Clinical and biochemical outcomes: Patients receiving fire needle acupuncture showed significantly better clinical outcomes, including lower pain scores, improved knee function, and decreased serum levels of IL-1β and MMP-3 compared to those receiving electroacupuncture. • Safety and efficacy: Fire needle acupuncture provides superior therapeutic effects and results in fewer adverse reactions compared to electroacupuncture, highlighting its safety and efficacy in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".