MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411190650 · doi:10.1111/iej.14261

Cellular dynamics and signalling mechanisms in dentine repair: A narrative review

2025· review· en· W4411190650 on OpenAlexaff
Vidhyashree Rajasekar, Mohamed Mahmoud Abdalla, Prasanna Neelakantan, Cynthia Kar Yung Yiu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Endodontic Journal · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicEndodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamics (music)Narrative reviewNarrativeSignallingDentistryMedicineCell biologyBiologyPsychologyIntensive care medicineArtLiterature

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Bioactive molecules have gained significant attention in regenerative medicine due to their ability to boost the reparative properties of stem cells, including those in the dental pulp. This narrative review aims to deepen our understanding of the dynamics of bioactive molecules in the dental pulp and their role in enhancing hard tissue reparative processes. OBJECTIVES: (i) To discuss the role of different cells and the critical pathways involved in dentine formation through direct (reparative) or indirect (infection control and immunomodulatory) mechanisms. (ii) To highlight how innovative therapeutic strategies could be employed to target key molecules for successful dentine repair and regeneration. METHODS: The review encompassed all years up to the search period. Databases such as PubMed, Scopus and Medline were utilized to gather relevant studies. The search strategy involved specific signalling molecules such as Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β), Bone Morphogenetic Proteins (BMP), Small Integrin Binding Ligand N-linked Glycoproteins (SIBLING) and growth factors. Cell types including odontoblasts, fibroblasts, immune cells and dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) were of interest. Additionally, signalling pathways like Wnt, Notch, Shh, amongst others, were investigated for their roles in repair mechanisms. Key terms were combined using Boolean operators [Cell type] AND [signalling molecules] AND/OR [dentine], [Cell type] AND/OR [signalling pathways] AND/OR [dentine] to include studies addressing the interaction of these components in enhancing repair processes. DISCUSSION: Key molecules such as TGF-β1, BMP and SIBLING proteins effectively enhance the dentine reparative response, whilst other molecules such as complement proteins and antimicrobial peptides primarily activate immune cells and facilitate pathogen clearance to promote the regenerative capabilities of DPSCs. This well-orchestrated interaction emphasizes the need to investigate the effects of these molecules on all cells within the dental pulp. Morphogenic signalling molecules such as BMP-2, -4 and -7, and Wnt show temporal, yet significant regenerative properties, whilst Shh and Notch present inconsistent effects on dentine regeneration, and a consensus on their roles and properties in dentine repair has yet to be reached. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the critical role of bioactive molecules in dentine repair to guide the development of next-generation bioinspired therapeutics for vital pulp therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Endodontic JournalSame topicEndodontics and Root Canal TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207