MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411193949 · doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2025.110026

Inclusion of the social costs of N2O emissions increases the financial benefits from N inhibitor use on corn production in Ontario, Canada

2025· article· en· W4411193949 on OpenAlex
Obed Teye Sappor, Aaron De Laporte, Azeem Tariq, Alfons Weersink, Brian Grant, Ward Smith, Claudia Wagner‐Riddle

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueField Crops Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversity of Guelph
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaOntario Ministry of Food and AgricultureEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaGrain Farmers of Ontario
KeywordsProduction (economics)BusinessFinancial inclusionNatural resource economicsInclusion (mineral)Agricultural economicsEnvironmental scienceAgronomyEconomicsFinanceFinancial servicesChemistryBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Context Crop agriculture contributes to climate change from N application, including direct nitrous oxide (N 2 O) emissions and indirect N 2 O emissions from volatilized ammonia (NH 3 ) and leached nitrate (NO 3 − ). To achieve future climate goals, the government of Canada seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agriculture N use by 30 % by 2030, including the use of N inhibitors. Objective This study examines the effects of N inhibitor use, with UAN and urea, at different N rates, on the financial and environmental performance of corn production in Elora, Ontario. Methods The study employs a bioeconomic model that incorporates yield, and environmental effects generated by the De-nitrification De-composition (DNDC) model with an economic maximization model that chooses optimal private (from a producer standpoint), and social (from a social planner standpoint) inhibitor use and N rate for two N sources, based on 30 weather-years. Results and conclusions The results indicate that, from an average private financial perspective, combined nitrification and urease inhibitors on corn production in Elora, Ontario, may not maximize profit with UAN or urea under the baseline price conditions ($302/t corn; $1.79/kg N). However, a variety of factors could make inhibitor use profitable: 1) specific weather conditions; 2) lower N rates; 3) consideration of social profits; 4) increasing social costs of N 2 O emissions; and 5) enhanced yield effects around 2 %. Therefore, the results show that inhibitor application can be recommended when there are favourable yield and weather conditions, when social costs are considered, and when applying N rates below the private economic optimum. N inhibitors may also reduce direct and indirect emissions from UAN application by between 33 % and 19.8 %, and Urea by between 17.7 % and 11.8 %, becoming less effective as the N application rate increases from 100 kg N/ha to 225 kg N/ha. Significance Inhibitors could play an important role in both on-farm GHG mitigation efforts and enhanced financial performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score0.352

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it