Exploration des narrations modulaires : une exemplification de la littérature analogique participative
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans cet article, un réseau d’oeuvres (Tauveron, 2002) permet d’aborder les oeuvres interactives, dans une perspective d’usage en classe. Nous allons nous concentrer sur les pratiques liées aux cultures de l’imaginaire (Ray, 2019; Lescouet & Vallières, 2023). Ces formes interactives, qui mobilisent des gestes de lecture variés, permettent d’aborder les imbrications du littéraire et du ludique dans une culture populaire toujours plus hybride. Après un aperçu des formes de narrations interactives analogiques, comme les romans-dont-vous-êtes-le-héros, les narrations modulaires en cartes ou encore les livres-plateaux, nous allons explorer la diversité du corpus disponible, tant à destination des plus jeunes lecteur·rice·s que des adolescent·e·s.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".