MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411200635 · doi:10.4095/ph656shyhb

Magnetic anomaly of the Teslin Tlingit Council traditional territory, Yukon

2025· report· fr· W4411200635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N Hayward, N R Cleven

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languagefr
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnomaly (physics)Magnetic anomalyGeologyGeographyClimatologyPhysical geographyPaleontologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le champ magnétique total résiduel, compilé à partir de données de levés aéromagnétiques accessibles au public, montre des variations dans l'intensité du champ magnétique sur le territoire de la Première nation des Teslin Tlingit. Ces variations sont généralement liées à des différences dans le type de roche ou à des variations dans la composition de la roche associées à l'histoire de la roche. Les petites caractéristiques sont liées à des roches proches de la surface, tandis que les grandes caractéristiques sont typiquement liées à des roches qui atteignent de grandes profondeurs, à plusieurs kilomètres sous terre. L'angle d'inclinaison du champ magnétique total résiduel est une version mathématiquement ajustée des données. Il met en évidence la rapidité avec laquelle le magnétisme associé aux différents types de roches dans la zone proche de la surface (faibles profondeurs) varie d'un endroit à l'autre, reflétant les contacts géologiques, y compris les failles, entre des roches de composition différente.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.622

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeomagnetism and Paleomagnetism StudiesFrench-language works237,207