MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411201247 · doi:10.14745/ccdr.v51i05a05

Acute histoplasmosis in four immunocompetent Canadian travellers to a cenote in Yucatán, Mexico

2025· article· en· W4411201247 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
E MacBain, Michael Hawkes, David A. Goldfarb, Jan Hájek

Bibliographic record

VenueCanada Communicable Disease Report · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFungal Infections and Studies
Canadian institutionsVancouver Infectious Diseases CentreUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistoplasmosisMedicineDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A group of four healthy Canadian travellers visited a cenote in the Yucatán peninsula in April 2024 and subsequently developed symptomatic histoplasmosis.Diagnosis was made in the acute period with a positive urine Histoplasma antigen test in three of the cases.Two developed severe presentations and were treated with itraconazole, including a three-year-old child with disseminated disease.The sensitivity of different modalities for diagnostics depends on the timing and severity of illness, with Histoplasma urine antigen being most sensitive in early infection, serology converting 4-8 weeks following exposure and cultures generally of low sensitivity.Treatment depends on the disease manifestations and host immunologic status.Many patients have relatively mild, self-limited, influenza-like illness and the diagnosis may be overlooked.Given the number of Canadian tourists travelling to the Yucatán peninsula and the popularity of visiting cenotes, awareness of the risk of histoplasmosis associated with this exposure should be promoted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.318

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanada Communicable Disease ReportSame topicFungal Infections and StudiesFrench-language works237,207