MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411202467 · doi:10.11159/jffhmt.2025.024

Numerical Investigation of Hybrid Immersion Cooling Strategies for Battery Packs in Light Electric Vehicles

2025· article· en· W4411202467 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Stefano Landini, Jack R. Panter, Anindita Roy, Gordhan Das Valasai, Mohammad Ismail

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass Transfer · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmersion (mathematics)Automotive engineeringBattery (electricity)Electric carsEnvironmental scienceEngineeringComputer sciencePhysicsMathematicsPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work investigates a new hybrid thermal management system (TMS) for light electric vehicle (LEV) battery packs that uses dielectric liquid immersion cooling, heat pipes and fins to effectively control lithium-ion battery (LIB) thermal load.Different commercial dielectric oil chemistries (Cargill DE-11772 and EF-3221, LK-STO50, and MIVOLT-DFK) are evaluated as heat transfer fluids (HTFs) and compared with air and deionised water as benchmark.Additionally, the effects of heat pipe diameters (4 mm, 6 mm, and 8 mm) and the number of fins (1, 2, 3, and 5) are analysed for two configurations: fins evenly distributed along the heat pipe and fins placed only on the upper half.A 3D steady-state CFD model is developed in Ansys 2024R2 to simulate the proposed TMS for a 4S4P (14.8V, 10 Ah) Lithium-Nickel Manganese Cobalt (NMC) battery pack.Under typical 2C discharge rate, the model examines the TMS thermal performance when simulating heat transfer with and without buoyancy effects.Buoyancy improves cooling performance, especially for viscous fluids, lowering battery, HTF, and heat sink temperatures by 20%.With modest LIB heat generation rates (up to 25 kW/m), the TMS ensures effective cooling with minimum temperature increase.However, when reaching heat generation rates up to 100 kW/m, the battery temperature reaches 91.13C, revealing the system's cooling capability limitations.The study examines the effect of changing heat sink and insulation equivalent convective heat transfer coefficients.Increasing the heat sink coefficient from 10 to 100 W/mK lowers the battery temperature from 138C to 49C, while increasing the insulation equivalent heat transfer coefficient from 1 to 50 W/mK lowers battery temperature from 92C to 46C.Also, the effect of heat pipes diameter and fins number and vertical distribution is analysed, pointing to the design with 5 evenly distributed fins to be the best thermally performing while limiting additional TMS mass.This study shows that the hybrid TMS using heat pipes, fins, immersion cooling improves compact LEV safety, performance, and battery longevity under high-demand situations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Fluid Flow Heat and Mass TransferSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207