Improved Reliability and Performance Evaluation of Switched-Boost Multiport Converter Using Time-Multiplexing Control
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this article, a novel bidirectional boost-side interleaved switched boost (BBSISB) multiport converter is proposed. The boost-side interleaving (BSI) of the converter improves its performance in terms of input current ripple and reliability in medium-power applications. The BSI reduces the input current ripple (i.e., zero at 50% of duty ratio), and it also provides an open circuit (OC) switch fault-tolerance index (FTI) of 100% at the load end. The switched-boost action topology uses time multiplexing of boost and buck switches to produce regulated voltage at output ports, whereas the boost-side phase interleaving provides the paralleling of large input boost current with reduced current ripple. The bidirectional capability of the converter enables the power flow from the battery to the load end in the absence of an input supply. The performance analysis of the proposed converter with respect to switching loss, conduction loss, FTI, current ripple, and cost is performed and compared with similar converters. An experimental setup of the BBSISB multiport converter is developed in the laboratory with a constant-current, constant-voltage (CC-CV) mode of charging of the battery to verify the derived analytical results.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".