MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411203577 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2025.3578644

Intelligent Localization-Based DDPG for UAV-Borne RIS in Vehicular Communication

2025· article· en· W4411203577 on OpenAlexaff
Ishtiaq Ahmad, Ramsha Narmeen, Hina Tabassum, Zdeněk Bečvář

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersGrantová Agentura České Republiky
KeywordsComputer scienceSystems engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a framework to simultaneously optimize the artificial noise (AN) covariance of eavesdroppers, the high-dimensional continuous phase shifts of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV)-borne reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs), and beamforming of base stations (BSs) in vehicular networks. This optimization aims to maximize the worst-case secrecy rate for vehicular users (VUs) amidst eavesdroppers considering inaccurate channel state information (CSI) and VUs' quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. We propose a predictive localization-based actor-critic deep reinforcement learning (DRL) solution. We employ a deep neural network (DNN) to predict the future spatial location of VUs and eavesdroppers, since these are apriory unknown. Then, the predicted positions are fed to a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) algorithm, which determines the AN matrix and RIS beamforming vector. The DDPG integrated with DNN-based predictive localization offers a significant advantage over the standard DDPG, as additional states are incorporated into the system, thereby enhancing the model's capability to coordinate DDPG based on predicted location and to capture more complex and abstract features of the highly dynamic vehicular network. Simulations demonstrate the proposed DDPG with predictive localization ensures secure and reliable communications, surpassing state-f-the-art baselines.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.976
Threshold uncertainty score0.843

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207