Asymmetric loading of TnsE regulates Tn7 targeting of DNA replication structures
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tn7 transposable elements are known for their sophisticated target-site selection mechanisms. For the prototypical Tn7 element, dedicated transposon-encoded proteins direct insertions to either a conserved site in the chromosome or replicating DNA structures in conjugal plasmids, ensuring the vertical and horizontal spread of the element. While the pathway targeting the attTn7 site in the bacterial chromosome has been extensively studied, the pathway targeting DNA replication structures remains poorly understood. We have used an integrative structural biology approach to elucidate how the Tn7-encoded protein TnsE recognizes replication sites. Using native mass spectrometry, we found that TnsE forms 1:1 and 2:1 (TnsE:DNA) complexes on 3'-recessed DNA, with gain-of-function TnsE variants favoring the formation of 2:1 complexes. Structural characterization confirms that two TnsE molecules bind to DNA with the C-terminal domain of the protein recognizing duplex DNA, leaving the N-terminal domain to impose DNA substrate specificity and recruit the core transposition machinery. Collectively, our work is consistent with a model where TnsE-mediated target-site selection relies on the formation of an asymmetric TnsE:DNA complex to recruit the Tn7 transposase to DNA replication structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".