MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411210708 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-zvz1c

Gaining quantitative fidelity from Raman spectra in regimesof large and varying fluorescence

2025· preprint· en· W4411210708 on OpenAlexaff
Mahsa Zarei, Austin Rothwell, Luke Melo, Sadegh Shokatian, Edward R. Grant

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRaman spectroscopyFluorescenceFidelityHigh fidelityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryComputer sciencePhysicsOpticsEnvironmental chemistryAcousticsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While Raman spectroscopy offers notable experimental advantages as a probe of complex mixtures, its application in practice often confronts samples that present an overwhelming fluorescence background. Here, we explore the efficacy of two particular Raman spectrometric strategies for quantitative analysis under conditions of high fluorescence interference. Calling upon very large datasets, we compare conventional Raman spectroscopy and Shifted Excitation Raman Difference Spectroscopy (SERDS) in an effort to determine which approach best overcomes obstacles presented by fluorescence under various experimental conditions. SERDS subtracts Raman spectra acquired at slightly different excitation wavelengths, which ideally removes an invariant fluorescence background. However, a question remains as to whether this difference waveform or the original spectrum, including the fluorescence, determines the sample composition with better accuracy. Calling upon stochastic simulations, we have constructed a 12- million spectrum database referring to binary mixtures of benzophenone and alanine in a fluorescent matrix representative of various experimental scenarios. We have found that multivariate regression models for the sample composition drawing upon conventional Raman libraries often achieve comparable or better prediction accuracy than SERDS for most fluorescence scenarios. The visually enhanced SERDS spectra do not necessarily translate to more accurate quantitative results. However, SERDS does outperform conventional Raman in scenarios involving highly variable, uncorrelated fluorescence backgrounds, effectively minimizing those challenging interferences. Both methods significantly benefit from preprocessing techniques such as Asymmetric Least Squares (ALS) and Discrete Wavelet Transforms (DWT), which enhance predictive accuracy by reducing baseline noise. This study emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate Raman analysis strategy based on specific fluorescence conditions, challenges assumptions about the superiority of visually distinct SERDS spectra, and provides new insights into leveraging Raman spectroscopy in real-world, fluorescence-rich environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicSpectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical ResearchFrench-language works237,207