MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411211961 · doi:10.2166/9781789065107_0001

Inledning

2025· book-chapter· sv· W4411211961 on OpenAlex
D. Aguado, J. Alferes, Queralt Plana, M.V. Ruano, Ola Samuelsson, Kris Villez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIWA Publishing eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagesv
FieldComputer Science
TopicResearch Data Management Practices
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Denna rapport gör en djupdykning i s.k. metadata från givare på avloppsreningsverk, inklusive metoder för att generera metadata. I detta inledande kapitel beskrivs drivkrafterna bakom den IWA task group MetaCO (Meta-data Collection and Organization) som har skrivit denna rapport. Drivkrafterna för rapporten inkluderar historiska datatekniska utmaningar (stora datamängder och dataflöden) och mer aktuella utmaningar såsom datastrukturer (hantering av olika typer och strukturer av data) och datakvalitet (validering av tillförlitlighet hos data). Kapitlet avslutas med ett stort tack till alla som bidragit till rapporten.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication, Open science
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.924
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.1290.102
Open science0.0150.015
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it