MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411212255 · doi:10.2166/9781789065107_0069

Strukturerad lagring av signaler samt deras metadata

2025· book-chapter· sv· W4411212255 on OpenAlex
Niels Nicolaï, Kris Villez, Queralt Plana

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIWA Publishing eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagesv
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detta kapitel syftar till att ge en översikt över hur signaldata och deras metadata kan struktureras, med betoning hantering och lagring. Specifikt fokuserar det på: (a) nyttan för organisation, (b) vilka data som ska lagras och vad som ska behållas, och (c) datahanteringsmetoder. I detta kapitel ges alltså svar på var och hur metadata ska lagras på ett effektivt sätt. I Kapitel 3 förklarades vad som anses vara metadata. I Kapitlen 5 och 6 beskrivs hur man samlar in vissa metadata genom särskilda valideringstester av sensorer (Kapitel 5) eller med dataanalytiska metoder (Kapitel 6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0200.005
Open science0.0060.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it