MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411212255 · doi:10.2166/9781789065107_0069

Strukturerad lagring av signaler samt deras metadata

2025· book-chapter· sv· W4411212255 on OpenAlexaff
Niels Nicolaï, Kris Villez, Queralt Plana

Bibliographic record

VenueIWA Publishing eBooks · 2025
Typebook-chapter
Languagesv
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataComputer scienceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Detta kapitel syftar till att ge en översikt över hur signaldata och deras metadata kan struktureras, med betoning hantering och lagring. Specifikt fokuserar det på: (a) nyttan för organisation, (b) vilka data som ska lagras och vad som ska behållas, och (c) datahanteringsmetoder. I detta kapitel ges alltså svar på var och hur metadata ska lagras på ett effektivt sätt. I Kapitel 3 förklarades vad som anses vara metadata. I Kapitlen 5 och 6 beskrivs hur man samlar in vissa metadata genom särskilda valideringstester av sensorer (Kapitel 5) eller med dataanalytiska metoder (Kapitel 6).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0080.011
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.050

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIWA Publishing eBooksSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207