Clinical Utility of IFIT Proteins in Human Malignancies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interferon (IFN)-induced proteins with tetratricopeptide repeats (IFITs) are key interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs), and in humans include IFIT1, IFIT2, IFIT3 and IFIT5. These proteins are primarily known for their role in the innate immune response to pathogens. However, growing evidence suggests that IFITs participate in a range of other cellular processes, including cancer development and progression. Notably, IFITs may behave in either a pro-oncogenic or tumor suppressive fashion depending on cancer types and emphasizing their potential dual function in tumorigenesis. Importantly, IFITs have shown potential to be utilized as clinical biomarkers in oncology. Their aberrant expression has been correlated with survival and other clinical outcomes, including resistance to radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted treatments and immunotherapy in various cancers. Additionally, they have also been reported to be a part of various clinical predictive models in cancers. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of IFIT proteins' involvement in cancers, with an emphasis on their emerging roles as clinically relevant biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".