Analisis Optimalisasi Nilai Thrust, Torque, Dan Efficiency Propeller B Series Dan Kaplan Series Pada Studi Kasus Kapal Pencalang 15 GT Menggunakan Metode CFD
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pencalang is a traditional sailing ship used as a merchant ship. Along with the times, Pencalang changed its function to become a patrol boat with the addition of a motor as its driving force. In the traditional wooden ship revitalization project, propeller selection is important because the ship uses a sail and motor system. This research analyzes the use of Kaplan propeller types to optimize thrust, torque, and efficiency where currently the propeller used for Pencalang ships is type B-series. The selection of the Kaplan propeller to be analyzed is based on the diameter that matches the availability of propeller space on the propeller ship or < Dpropeller B-series g. The selection of kaplan propellers resulted in kaplan types K4-55 and K4-70 with diameters of 0.659 and 0.619, respectively. The B-series and kaplan series propellers that have been selected are then analyzed using modeling software and simulation software that has calculated its error using MAPE with the result of an error < 10%. The simulation results in the software show that the Kaplan series propeller can be used as an option for the type of propeller that can be used on Pencalang if a propeller replacement will be carried out later, because with a smaller diameter compared to the B-series propeller it will produce greater thrust and torque. The Kaplan series propeller that produces the highest thrust and torque is K4-70 with a maximum thrust value of 6966.76 N and a maximum torque of 978.977 Nm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it