Altered immunometabolic response to fasting in humans living with obesity
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fasting and ketosis are gaining interest for treating obesity-related immunometabolic dysfunction. We aimed to (1) characterize systemic and T cell immunometabolic responses to a 48-h fast in humans and (2) determine if responses differed between individuals with (O-BMI) and without (L-BMI) obesity (n = 16 per group). Despite similar increases in systemic fat oxidation, increases in blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB), BHB-amino acid conjugates, and lysine β-hydroxybutyrylation were blunted in obesity. T cells from the L-BMI group upregulated their relative capacity for fat oxidation while the O-BMI group did not. The O-BMI group had a greater proportion of Th17 cells and secreted more interleukin-17 (IL-17), even after fasting. CD8 expression decreased in both groups and CD4 expression only decreased in the L-BMI group. The balance of anti-to pro-inflammatory cytokines increased less in the O-BMI group. Collectively, these findings show that humans living with obesity have a blunted systemic and T cell immunometabolic response to fasting. NCT05886738.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".