Validation and Community Sharing of Ocean Spectral Libraries Generated by Machine Learning for Data Independent Acquisition Ocean Metaproteomic Analyses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ocean metaproteomics provides valuable insights into the structure and function of marine microbial communities. Yet, ocean samples are challenging due to their extensive biological diversity, which results in a very large number of peptides with a large dynamic range. This study characterized the capabilities of data independent acquisition (DIA) mode for use in ocean metaproteomic samples. Spectral libraries were constructed from discovered peptides and proteins using machine learning (ML) algorithms to remove the incorporation of false positives in the libraries. When compared with 1-dimensional and 2-dimensional data dependent acquisition analyses (DDA), DIA outperformed DDA both with and without gas phase fractionation. We found that larger discovered protein spectral libraries performed better, regardless of the geographic distance between where samples were collected for library generation and where the test samples were collected. Moreover, the spectral library containing all unique proteins present in the Ocean Protein Portal (OPP) outperformed smaller libraries generated from individual sampling campaigns. However, a spectral library constructed from all open reading frames (ORFs) in a metagenome was found to be too large to be workable, resulting in low peptide identifications due to challenges in maintaining a low false discovery rate with such a large database size. Given sufficient sequencing depth and validation studies, spectral libraries generated from previously discovered proteins can serve as a community resource, saving resequencing efforts. The spectral libraries generated in this study are available at the OPP to enable future ocean proteomic studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".