MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411234531 · doi:10.3822/ijtmb.v18i2.1203

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Deep Transverse Frictional Massage Combined with Conventional Physiotherapy for Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2025· review· en· W4411234531 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sathya Siva, Prathap Suganthirababu, Ved Prakash, James S. Titus, S. Vignesh, K Priyadharshini, S Dhanusia, S. Santhanalakshmi, J. Vanitha, K. P. Das, Mohammed Arifullah Mohamed Fazulah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMassageBodyworkMeta-analysisMedicinePhysical therapyAcupunctureTendinopathySystematic reviewPhysical medicine and rehabilitationAlternative medicineManual therapyMEDLINEMedical physicsTendonSurgeryPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Tendinopathies are common musculoskeletal disorders characterized by pain and functional impairment, often requiring therapeutic interventions for effective management. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of deep transverse frictional massage (DTFM) combined with conventional therapy for the treatment of tendinopathies. Methods: A study search of electronic databases including MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases, was conducted for randomized controlled trials, pilot study, and comparative study design comparing the combined application of DTFM with conventional physiotherapy (e.g., exercise, stretching, or modalities) to conventional therapy alone for the treatment of tendinopathies. Inclusion criteria were studies that reported clinical outcomes such as pain reduction and disability. Data extraction was performed independently by reviewers. A meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models to estimate the pooled effect size, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias approach. Results: A total of 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. The combined treatment group (DTFM + conventional therapy) showed significant improvements in pain reduction (standardized mean difference (SMD) = −0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): −14.50, p < 0.05) and elbow (SMD = −2.67, 95% CI: −3.38 to −1.96, p < 0.05) compared to conventional therapy alone. No significant adverse effects were reported. Conclusion: The findings suggest that DTFM, when combined with conventional therapy, offers significant benefits over conventional therapy alone in the management of tendinopathies, particularly in reducing pain and improving function. The exact physiological mechanisms through which DTFM works in combination with conventional therapies remain unclear. Research into how DTFM influences tissue healing, collagen remodeling, or pain reduction pathways could provide more insights into its effectiveness and guide its integration into treatment protocols.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.357
Threshold uncertainty score0.885

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.158
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.397 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & PracticeSame topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207