MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411235499 · doi:10.3390/ijms26125650

CEST MRI in the Management/Diagnosis of Neuroinfectious Diseases

2025· review· en· W4411235499 on OpenAlexaff
Zoe A. Kortje, Horacio Bach

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeuroimagingMagnetic resonance imagingMedicineClinical PracticeNeurosciencePathologyRadiologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) MRI is a novel technique that allows for the specific imaging of certain molecules that contain exchangeable protons. Neuroimaging is a major contributor to diagnosing and monitoring infections of the central nervous system (CNS). This review focuses on summarizing the current literature surrounding the use of CEST MRI imaging in diagnosing, monitoring, and treating CNS infections. BacCEST is a new technique to detect bacterial infection in organs at profound levels. This technique allows for the specific pathogen causing the infection to be understood, allowing for tailored antibiotic therapies. The bacCEST signal is also directly proportional to the number of bacterial cells; this means it can be used over periods to track response to treatment via cell numbers. The results show that most of the research in this area has focused on infections of the brain parenchyma (e.g., encephalitis) and that most studies investigate the use of CEST in animal models, with a minority exploring the application of CEST to human participants. The common neuroinfectious disease presentations relevant to clinical medicine are also briefly described, as well as the traditional and modern imaging techniques used to visualize them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Molecular SciencesSame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207