MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411239438 · doi:10.7185/geochemlet.2520

Solar neon dissolution into an ultramafic magma ocean

2025· article· en· W4411239438 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Carolina Dantas Cardoso, M. Moreira, Bruno Scaillet

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemical Perspectives Letters · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMcGill University
KeywordsUltramafic rockNeonDissolutionMagmaAstrobiologyGeologyEnvironmental scienceEarth scienceGeochemistryChemistryChemical engineeringVolcanoPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The solar-like neon isotopic signature of the mantle suggests the presence of a primitive reservoir. Its origin remains a puzzle, though the literature suggests that a primordial H2 and He-rich atmosphere captured from the accretion disk was dissolved into a magma ocean. Our study investigates how much neon can be incorporated into the magma ocean based on the basal pressure of such an atmosphere and the neon solubility in mafic to ultramafic melts (49–34 wt. % SiO2 and 9–21 wt. % MgO). The neon solubility range obtained (3.4 × 10−4 to 6.5 × 10−5 cm3 STP g−1 bar−1) cannot match the primitive mantle theoretical neon content in a slow accretion scenario, demanding either fast accretion or alternative models for neon origin on Earth. Considering the planetary embryo mass required to accumulate enough neon (>0.8 times the mass of the Earth), the hypothesis of partial dissolution of the atmosphere into the magma ocean remains difficult to consider.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeochemical Perspectives LettersSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207