MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411244253 · doi:10.1177/2050313x251343300

Upadacitinib as a potential management option for diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis: A case report

2025· article· en· W4411244253 on OpenAlexaff
Sidra Sarfaraz, Janis Chang, Mark G. Kirchhof

Bibliographic record

VenueSAGE Open Medical Case Reports · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsOttawa Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineNintedanibInterstitial lung diseaseScleroderma (fungus)SclerodactylyMucocutaneous zonePirfenidoneDermatologyMorpheaPrednisoneSurgeryCalcinosisDiseaseInternal medicineLungPathologyIdiopathic pulmonary fibrosisCalcification

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a complex disease involving vasculopathy, immune dysfunction, and fibrosis, with varied clinical presentations that complicate treatment standardization. It often affects multiple organs, including the skin, lungs, gastrointestinal tract, and kidneys. We present a 52-year-old woman with a 14-year history of diffuse cutaneous SSc with severe, treatment-resistant manifestations. She had Raynaud's disease with digital ulceration and auto-amputation, telangiectasias, sclerodactyly, esophageal scleroderma, interstitial lung disease, and extensive calcinosis requiring multiple surgeries. Her disease remained poorly controlled despite treatment with nintedanib, sevelamer, colchicine, tadalafil, and prior immunosuppressants such as prednisone and mycophenolate mofetil. We initiated a trial of upadacitinib which resulted in improved vascular and cutaneous symptoms. Overall, upadacitinib provided meaningful clinical benefits despite her refractory, multisystem disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAGE Open Medical Case ReportsSame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207