MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411245419 · doi:10.1111/jpy.70049

First report of articuliths (free‐living geniculate corallines, Corallinales, Rhodophyta) in the northern hemisphere revealed during diversity surveys of Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada

2025· article· en· W4411245419 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Gary W. Saunders

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Phycology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine and coastal plant biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNew Brunswick Innovation FoundationCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBiologyCeramialesSouthern HemisphereGeniculateDiversity (politics)Evolutionary biologyZoologyEcologyAlgaeAnthropology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free-living coralline beds are typically composed of rhodoliths, or unattached non-geniculate coralline algae. In 2017, the first beds comprised primarily of free-living geniculate coralline algae, termed articuliths, were documented in Arraial do Cabo Bay in southeastern Brazil. During routine barcode surveys of the Haida Gwaii, British Columbia, Canada flora, 16 rhodolith-like specimens were collected from a rhodolith bed that DNA sequences assigned to the geniculate taxa Calliarthron tuberculosum and Bossiella sp. 1heteroforma. To our knowledge, articuliths have not been documented outside of Brazil; this discovery thus documents the first instance of northern hemisphere articuliths. Despite disparate gross morphologies to attached conspecific populations, anatomical observations revealed internal anatomies consistent with those of attached forms but with a significant reduction in the number of genicula and increased uniformity in intergenicular shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.197
Threshold uncertainty score0.396

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of PhycologySame topicMarine and coastal plant biologyFrench-language works237,207