MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411245633 · doi:10.7573/dic.2025-3-2

Primary hyperhidrosis: an updated review

2025· review· en· W4411245633 on OpenAlexaff
Mahan Maazi, Alexander K. C. Leung, Joseph M. Lam

Bibliographic record

VenueDrugs in Context · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis Treatments
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHyperhidrosisDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hyperhidrosis (HH) is a condition characterized by excessive sweating beyond the physiological needs of thermoregulation. HH can be classified as primary (idiopathic) hyperhidrosis (PHH) or secondary hyperhidrosis (SHH), which is associated with underlying medical conditions, medications or systemic disorders. This narrative review provides an updated overview of PHH, with a focus on epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnostic approaches and current management strategies, particularly highlighting pharmacological and procedural treatment options. Methods: A literature search was conducted in February 2025 across Ovid Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) using the key term "hyperhidrosis". The review included observational studies, clinical trials, narrative reviews, guidelines and meta-analyses published in the past 10 years. Additional references were identified through manual searches of relevant bibliographies. Results: The global prevalence of PHH is estimated to range between 0.072% and 9%, with PHH accounting for 93% of all HH cases. Whilst the precise pathophysiology remains unclear, PHH is believed to result from sympathetic overactivity, whereas SHH is associated with endocrine, neurological, infectious, malignant and medication-induced causes. PHH is diagnosed clinically and distinguishing between primary and secondary forms is essential. Management options vary based on severity, ranging from topical therapies (antiperspirants, anticholinergics), systemic medications (oral anticholinergics, adrenergic modulators), device-based interventions (iontophoresis, microwave thermolysis), injectable therapies (botulinum toxin) and surgical approaches (sympathectomy, excision, liposuction/curettage). Whilst these interventions can significantly improve symptoms and quality of life, long-term efficacy, recurrence and adverse effects remain concerns. Conclusion: PHH significantly impacts the quality life of patients contributing to both physical discomfort and psychosocial distress. An individualized, multi-modal approach is crucial to optimizing management. Further research is warranted to refine existing therapies and evaluate emerging treatment modalities for improved long-term outcomes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0080.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDrugs in ContextSame topicSympathectomy and Hyperhidrosis TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207