Bed Load Transport in Channels with Vegetated Banks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estimating bed load in rivers is a critical aspect of river engineering. Numerous methods have been developed to quantify bed load transport, often yielding varying results depending on the bed surface texture and grain size. This study aims to investigate how vegetation on channel banks and bed material particle size influence bed load transport, bed shear stress, velocity distribution, and the Shields parameter. It also examines the impact of geometric changes in the channel cross-section on bed load transport capacity. To address these objectives, a novel simulation method was developed to analyze the effects of vegetated banks, bed material size, and channel geometry. Field investigations were carried out in two reaches of the Taleghan River in Iran—one with vegetated banks and one without. Complementary flume experiments were conducted at two scales, incorporating vegetation on the sidewalls. Results showed that Shields parameter distribution corresponded with bed load distribution across cross-sections. Increase in flow rate and the Shields parameter led to higher bedload transport rates. Near vegetated banks, flow velocity, shear stress, and bedload transport were significantly reduced, with velocity profiles showing distinct variations compared to non-vegetated sections.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".