Methods for processing and analyzing images of vascularized micro-organ and tumor systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our group has developed and validated an advanced microfluidic platform to improve preclinical modeling of healthy and disease states, enabling extended culture and detailed analysis of tissue-engineered miniaturized organ constructs, or “organs-on-chips.” Within this system, diverse cell types self-organize into perfused microvascular networks under dynamic flow within tissue chambers, effectively mimicking the structure and function of native tissues. This setup facilitates physiological intravascular delivery of nutrients, immune cells, and therapeutic agents, and creates a realistic microenvironment to study cellular interactions and tissue responses. Known as the vascularized micro-organ (VMO), this adaptable platform can be customized to represent various organ systems or tumors, forming a vascularized micro-tumor (VMT) for cancer studies. The VMO/VMT system closely simulates in vivo nutrient exchange and drug delivery within a 3D microenvironment, establishing a high-fidelity model for drug screening and mechanistic studies in vascular biology, cancer, and organ-specific pathologies. Furthermore, the optical transparency of the device supports high-resolution, real-time imaging of fluorescently labeled cells and molecules within the tissue construct, providing key insights into drug responses, cell interactions, and dynamic processes such as epithelial-mesenchymal transition. To manage the extensive imaging data generated, we created standardized, high-throughput workflows for image analysis. This manuscript presents our image processing and analysis pipeline, utilizing a suite of tools in Fiji/ImageJ to streamline data extraction from the VMO/VMT model, substantially reducing manual processing time. Additionally, we demonstrate how these tools can be adapted for analyzing imaging data from traditional in vitro models and microphysiological systems developed by other researchers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".