MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411254863 · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2025.101155

Multinationals’ implementation strategy for inclusive supply chains in Mexico

2025· article· en· W4411254863 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganizational Dynamics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Socioeconomic Development
Canadian institutionsHEC Montréal
FundersHEC MontréalNational Science Foundation
KeywordsSupply chainBusinessProcess managementIndustrial organizationOperations managementEconomicsMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We examine the strategy implementation of three Multinationals (MNCs) in building an inclusive supply chain. Drawing from qualitative data: interviews and observations for these three inclusive supply chains included the poor Mexican farmers, the cooperatives which represent the farmers, NGOs supporting the inclusive supply chain, and the MNCs leadership. The process the MNCs employ to build these supply chains focuses on four specific challenges; lack of preparation; operational challenges; unprepared farmers, building the system to profitable. Finally, we propose a series of practical suggestions for MNCs interested in executing inclusive supply chain strategies to help reduce inequalities in other emerging economies striving to build such a strategic effort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.275
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it