MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-thermal plasma-assisted dry reforming of methane: catalyst design, in situ characterization and hybrid system development

2025· article· en· W4411255358 on OpenAlexafffund
Hangtian Hu, Hoang M. Nguyen, Wenping Li, Aiguo Wang, Zheng Li, Jiu Wang, Feiyue Shen, Liquan Jing, Zhangxin Chen, Ian D. Gates, Jinguang Hu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicCatalysts for Methane Reforming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsMethaneIn situCarbon dioxide reformingCharacterization (materials science)CatalysisPlasmaThermalMaterials scienceChemical engineeringChemistryEnvironmental scienceNanotechnologyThermodynamicsSyngasEngineeringPhysicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The synergistic integration of non-thermal plasma and catalysis in dry reforming of methane (DRM) has unveiled new avenues for transforming greenhouse gases (CH 4 and CO 2 ) into valuable products while concurrently reducing environmental impact. Despite its operation at low temperatures and atmospheric pressure, high energy consumption and low selectivity hinder industrial-scale adoption. Addressing these challenges requires the development of catalysts with enhanced selectivity, improved interactions with electric fields, and prolonged stability. This review examines how the physical and chemical properties of catalysts profoundly impact DRM. Physical properties influence plasma discharge, altering the electric field and electron energy, while chemical properties play a crucial role in surface reactions, especially in forming specific products like liquid oxygenates. This review also highlights advanced in situ characterization techniques that reveal related reaction mechanisms and explores emerging hybrid systems that combine plasma with thermal catalysis, photocatalysis, or electrocatalysis, offering promising solutions for practical plasma-assisted DRM implementation. It emphasizes the need for unified catalyst performance prediction criteria and advanced in-situ characterization to unravel the reaction mechanisms. By covering both traditional and novel hybrid plasma-catalyst systems, this review aims to serve as a comprehensive guide for researchers and industry professionals to advance their expertise in this transformative field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Hydrogen EnergySame topicCatalysts for Methane ReformingFrench-language works237,207