The Role of International Organisations in Urban Planning in Sub-Saharan African Cities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of international organisations in the design and implementation of urban plans in Africa has gained significant traction in recent years, particularly in installing large-scale infrastructure, development financing, research and innovation. Despite these trends, limited research exists on the influence of international organisations on urban master planning in Sub-Saharan Africa. Through exploratory research design, this chapter evaluates the influence of international organisations on African urban planning by reviewing six urban master plans across Sub-Saharan Africa. To validate the findings from the plans, we interviewed seven experts in urban master planning and international organisation project funding. The findings show the increasing influence of international organisations on urban master planning in the form of technical cooperation, financial investment and knowledge transfer. Japan International Cooperation Agency, the World Bank Group, the Canadian International Development Agency, USAID and China have provided the most technical/financial assistance in African urban planning in the last three decades. However, the complex nature of local participation and the growing interests of government actors in urban planning have significantly reduced this influence. The chapter advocates for broader viewpoints of urban planning aimed at domesticating urban infrastructure finance and technical expertise.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".