MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411257735 · doi:10.1108/imr-10-2024-0425

Multi-stakeholder approach in MNEs’ product advertising: evolutionary paths of content and language

2025· article· en· W4411257735 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Chiara Civera, Cecilia Casalegno, Brigida Morelli, Cristian Rizzo

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Marketing Review · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessStakeholderMarketingProduct (mathematics)Industrial organizationContent (measure theory)AdvertisingStakeholder theoryMathematicsPolitical sciencePublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Despite growing calls for practical insights on the multi-stakeholder approach in marketing and its communications, there is no empirical evidence of such kind in international advertising. This study aims to examine whether and how multinational enterprises (MNEs) have redesigned international advertising to reflect multi-stakeholder principles in language and content over time. Design/methodology/approach We adopt a mixed methodological approach based on literature review, the Delphi method and content analysis of 258 international advertising campaigns from 86 Global Reptrak® most reputed MNEs in 2016, 2019 and 2022. Furthermore, we use the Apriori algorithm, which analyzes advertising campaigns’ keyword complementarity and substitution trends. Findings From 2016 to 2022, MNEs are gradually shifting from focusing solely on product-centered content and language to integrating broader values, such as responsibility, sustainability, humanity and ethics, which address the interests of diverse stakeholder groups in their international advertising campaigns. Research limitations/implications Our study offers a homogeneous picture of digital international advertisements spread mainly in Southern Europe, Turkey, Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and India, with no relevant differences detected in the contents and language. Future studies could replicate our analysis by including advertisements spread in other emerging countries, which we did not cover for methodological reasons. Practical implications Our study guides marketers on integrating multiple stakeholder values into their advertisements. Originality/value Our research provides a novel contribution to the evolution of traditional marketing communications towards a multi-stakeholder approach by identifying three main evolutionary paths for international advertising: unimodal, bimodal and multimodal communication in 2016, 2019 and 2022, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Marketing ReviewSame topicDigital Marketing and Social MediaFrench-language works237,207