MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411267524 · doi:10.22318/icls2025.923881

Co-Creation of Visual Stories: Representing Agency for Mathematics Learning with Forcibly Displaced Students

2025· article· en· W4411267524 on OpenAlexafffund
Shima Dadkhahfard, Miwa Aoki Takeuchi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings. · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAgency (philosophy)Mathematics educationComputer scienceVisual artsArtificial intelligenceMathematicsSociologyArtSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study examines the impact of visual stories co-created with forcibly displaced children to express their agentic possibilities within the school context, particularly in mathematics classrooms.Using participatory co-design processes, six arts-based workshops were designed and facilitated for families to collaboratively illustrate stories of agency, identity, and belonging.Findings, in the form of co-designed visual stories, demonstrate students' use of visual representations to reclaim agency after experiencing forced displacement.The visual stories also highlight educators' roles in facilitating in-school mathematics learning experiences.This research underscores the potential of arts-based co-creation as a tool for children experiencing intersectional oppression to voice their lived experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.005
Open science0.0020.011
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.464
Teacher spread0.432 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings.Same topicInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsFrench-language works237,207