MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411272087 · doi:10.1109/msr66628.2025.00097

Under the Blueprints: Parsing Unreal Engine’s Visual Scripting at Scale

2025· article· en· W4411272087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTeaching and Learning Programming
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceScripting languageParsingProgramming languageScale (ratio)Computer graphics (images)Artificial intelligenceNatural language processing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Unreal Engine, a popular game engine for AAA (high budget, high profile) title video games, Blueprint Visual Scripting is a widely used tool for developing gameplay elements using visual node and edge-based source code. Despite its widespread adoption, there is limited research on the intersection of software engineering and Blueprint-based visual programming. This dataset aims to address this gap by providing parsed Blueprint graphs extracted from Unreal Engine’s binary UAsset files. We developed extractors and a custom parser to mine Blueprint graphs from 335,753 Blueprint UAsset files across $\mathbf{2 4, 0 0 9}$ GitHub projects. By providing this dataset, we hope to encourage future research on the structure and usage of Unreal Engine Blueprints, and promote the development of tools—such as code smell detectors and language models for code completion-that can optimize visual programming practices within Unreal Engine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.928
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTeaching and Learning ProgrammingFrench-language works237,207