MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Framework of Real2Sim Teleoperation System for Evaluating Surgical Robotic Tool Design

2025· article· en· W4411272487 on OpenAlexafffund
Teng Li, Thomas Looi, Dale J. Podolsky

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAugmented Reality Applications
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick Children
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsTeleoperationComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionTeleroboticsRobotSurgical robotSystems engineeringSimulationEngineeringMobile robotArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the process of designing a surgical robotic tool, a teleoperation system is necessary to evaluate the tool design in a simulated environment via virtual surgical tasks. It is possible to build such a system by involving a physical da Vinci Surgical System (dVSS) and using its master tool manipulator (MTM) to teleoperate the virtual robotic tool for evaluation. However, extensive testing and debugging require a more general and portable teleoperation system. In this work, we propose a general framework for establishing a real-to-sim teleoperation system. In the system, the real robot's Cartesian pose is first transformed, scaled, and mapped into the sim robot's coordinate system. Then, the resulting pose, as the desired pose of the sim robot, will proceed through a numerical inverse kinematics (IK) solver. The numerical IK solution is used to update the current joint configuration of the sim robot, which enables an independent and compact teleoperation system. Additionally, the numerical IK solution can be channeled to other simulation platforms for visualizing the sim robot with joint command control, where various virtual surgical tasks can be designed and conducted for further tool evaluation. Preliminary experiments were conducted to evaluate an established Omni-to-Unity teleoperation system, and the system's stability, accuracy, and usability were assessed and verified by the experimental results. The established teleoperation system can be used to streamline and facilitate robotic tool design and evaluation. Furthermore, the proposed real 2 sim framework can be easily adapted to a variety of application scenarios where both the real and sim robots can be specified by the user for different purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score0.267

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAugmented Reality ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207