Group theater as a collective experience in the face of neoliberal challenges in the urban context — a brief reflection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This reflection begins with the praxis of group theater, its collectivized mode of organization, and its counter-hegemonic experiences. The text seeks to articulate a range of concepts such as commons, heterotopias, the right to the city, and theoretical approaches to what manifests and is present in the world today. In this sense, this reflection encompasses what can be observed through group theater not only as a form of resistance to the challenges imposed by neoliberalism, but as exercises for a world yet to be born. Through the characteristics that comprise the historical subject of group theater, it seems possible to identify in collective action the practice of equality, justice, guarantee and expansion of social rights from a collaborative, collective, and community-based perspective. The theoretical framework draws on concepts from fields such as urban geography, social psychology, and the performing arts, referencing authors such as David Harvey, Julia Caminha, Michel Foucault, Pierre Dardot and Christian Laval, João Tonucci, and André Carrera.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.036 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.014 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".