MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411276387 · doi:10.1093/icb/icaf092

Sexual Selection, Energetics and Ecological Innovation: How Sexual Selection Diversifies the Landscape of Behavior, Morphology and Physiology

2025· article· en· W4411276387 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ummat Somjee, Matthew J. Fuxjager, Purnati Khuntia, Rebecca E. Koch, Luke C. Larter, Noah T. Leith, Venkatesh Nagarajan‐Radha, Alexandre V. Palaoro, Anusha Shankar, Yash Sondhi, Silu Wang, Michael J. Ryan, Justin C. Havird

Bibliographic record

VenueIntegrative and Comparative Biology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Behavior and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDepartment of Atomic Energy, Government of IndiaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsEnergeticsSelection (genetic algorithm)Sexual selectionMorphology (biology)BiologyEcologyEvolutionary biologyZoologyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sexual selection drives the evolution of a broad diversity of traits, such as the enlarged claws of fiddler crabs, the high-energy behavioral displays of hummingbirds, the bright red plumage of house finches, the elaborated antennae of moths, the wing "snapping" displays of manakins and the calculated calls of túngara frogs. A majority of work in sexual selection has aimed to measure the magnitude of these traits. Yet, we know surprisingly little about the physiology shaping such a diversity of sexually selected behavior and supportive morphology. The energetic properties underlying sexual signals are ultimately fueled by metabolic machinery at multiple scales, from mitochondrial properties and enzymatic activity to hormonal regulation and the modification of muscular and neural tissues. However, different organisms have different physiological constraints and face various ecological selection pressures; thus, selection operates and interacts at multiple scales to shape sexually selected traits and behavior. In this perspective piece, we describe illustrative case studies in different organisms to emphasize that understanding the physiological and energetic mechanisms that shape sexual traits may be critical to understanding their evolution and ramifications with ecological selection. We discuss (1) the way sexual selection shapes multiple integrated components of physiology, behavior, and morphology, (2) the way that sexually selected carotenoid pigments may reflect some aspects of cellular processes, (3) the relationship between sexually selected modalities and energetics, (4) the hormone ecdysone and its role in shaping sex-specific phenotypes in insects, (5) the way varied interaction patterns and social contexts select for signaling strategies that are responsive to social scenes, and (6) the role that sexual selection may have in the exploitation of novel thermal niches. Our major objective is to describe how sexually selected behavior, physiology, and ecology are shaped in diverse organisms so that we may develop a deeper and more integrated understanding of sexual trait evolution and its ecological consequences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.734
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIntegrative and Comparative BiologySame topicAnimal Behavior and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207