MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411277188 · doi:10.1145/3732772.3733526

Brief Announcement: Distributed Download from an External Data Source in Byzantine Majority Settings

2025· article· en· W4411277188 on OpenAlexafffund
John Augustine, Soumyottam Chatterjee, Valerie King, Manish Kumar, Shachar Meir, David Peleg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDownloadComputer scienceByzantine architectureByzantine fault toleranceDistributed computingWorld Wide WebHistoryAncient historyFault tolerance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the Download problem in the Data Retrieval Model, introduced in (DISC'24), where a distributed set of peers, some of which may be Byzantine, seek to learn n bits of data stored at a trustworthy external data source. Each bit of data can be learned by a peer either through a direct (costly) query of the source or through other peers that have already learned it; the goal is to design a collaborative protocol that reduces the maximum number of bits queried by any one peer ("query complexity"). We achieve optimal query complexity in a synchronous fully connected network with resilience to any constant fraction β < 1 of Byzantine peers, under varying assumptions regarding time and message size.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHistorical, Religious, and Philosophical StudiesFrench-language works237,207