MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411280793 · doi:10.1186/s11671-025-04276-w

Nose to brain delivery of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with rivastigmine and nilotinib for treating Alzheimer’s disease: preparation, cell line study, and in vivo evaluation

2025· article· en· W4411280793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Nano · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicAdvancements in Transdermal Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsBioPhage Pharma (Canada)
FundersDepartment of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, India
KeywordsRivastigmineNilotinibIn vivoMedicinePharmacologyDiseaseInternal medicineDementiaDonepezilBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative that affects over 55 million people worldwide, a number expected to double by 2050 due to aging populations. This growing prevalence imposes immense societal and economic burdens on healthcare systems and caregivers. AD is challenging to treat with monotherapy, making combination therapy a more effective approach. This study focuses on delivering Rivastigmine tartrate (RIV), and Nilotinib hydrochloride monohydrate (NIL), to the brain to achieve synergistic effects against AD. The optimal ratio of the drug combination was determined using the combination index that was performed using the Neuro2a cells line. It was found to be 1:1, emphasizing the synergistic effect against the cell lines. So, nanostructured lipid carriers (NLCs) were loaded with RIV and NIL, both individually and in combination, developed and optimized in this study. The developed formulations were thoroughly characterized for globule size, polydispersity index (PDI), and entrapment efficiency (EE) for each drug and the combination. The globule size was > 200 nm, PDI > 0.3; EE < 85% in all the developed formulations. On performing an in vitro cell availability study it was found that developed NLCs showed a 1.3 to 1.4-fold increase in the viability of the cells. On conducting an in vivo study, the concentration in the brain following administration of different formulations was in the order of RIV-NIL-NLC > NIL-NLC > RIV-NLC > RIV-NIL SUS > NIL-SUS > RIV-SUS. There was a 3.5 to 5-fold increase in the concentration of RIV and NIL in the brain when administered as RIV-NIL-NLC. So, it can be concluded that the NLCs with combined drugs showed promising results, enhancing drug permeability through the intranasal route, therefore could be used for treating AD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.311
Threshold uncertainty score0.796

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.370 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it