MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4411284055 · doi:10.1111/bjet.13608

<scp>ICT</scp> knowledge absorptive capacity: A critical factor for technology integration in schools

2025· article· en· W4411284055 on OpenAlex
Sandra Fischer‐Schöneborn, Chris Brown, Burak Aydın, Stephen MacGregor, Marcus Pietsch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital literacy in education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsAbsorptive capacityInformation and Communications TechnologyTechnology integrationKnowledge managementFactor (programming language)BusinessComputer scienceEducational technologyPsychologyPedagogyWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This study examines whether and how a school's information and communication technology (ICT) knowledge absorptive capacity (ACAP) affects technology integration in schools. In addition, it investigates the influence of various contextual factors on the degree of contingency of ACAP, such as activation triggers, social integration mechanisms and regimes of appropriability. The study is based on a random sample of N = 411 schools representative of Germany. Structural equation modelling and machine learning were employed. The findings indicate that ICT ACAP has a positive impact on technology integration in schools and serves as a mediator in the relationship between external knowledge and technology integration. The impact of ICT ACAP on technology integration is contingent upon the presence and efficacy of knowledge‐sharing mechanisms within the school, as well as the extent to which schools engage in collaborative efforts with competitors (coopetition). The insights of this study have implications for policymakers and educational leaders, who could prioritize building ACAP and fostering collaborative networks to create more adaptable and innovative school environments. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic For schools, technology integration is considered an important educational innovation. Acquiring, creating and sharing knowledge are essential for an efficient technology integration. Knowledge absorptive capacity (ACAP) is a critical factor in the acquisition of knowledge. What this paper adds Higher information and communication technology (ICT) ACAP is associated with increased technology integration. ICT ACAP mediates between the depth of external knowledge and technology integration. The efficacy of ACAP is contingent upon a number of contextual variables, in particular, knowledge sharing in schools and coopetition. Implications for practice and/or policy Schools need to identify, integrate and exploit relevant ICT knowledge to integrate technology successfully. Schools must develop systematic knowledge management systems to ensure that newly acquired knowledge is used reasonably. Schools must collaborate, even if they compete, to succeed in technology integration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.243
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it